c4056d13b73ec509386770b94f8684d53f1b73ac
java/com.sap.sse.common/src/com/sap/sse/common/impl/RenamableImpl.java
| ... | ... | @@ -25,5 +25,4 @@ public class RenamableImpl implements Renamable { |
| 25 | 25 | public void setName(String newName) { |
| 26 | 26 | this.name = newName; |
| 27 | 27 | } |
| 28 | - |
|
| 29 | 28 | } |
java/com.sap.sse.security/src/com/sap/sse/security/impl/SecurityServiceInitialLoadExtensionsDTO.java
| ... | ... | @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ import com.sap.sse.security.shared.impl.LockingAndBanning; |
| 16 | 16 | * initial load format can be added to this DTO type. The benefit, compared to adding new content with |
| 17 | 17 | * explicit {@link ObjectOutputStream#writeObject(Object)} and {@link ObjectInputStream#readObject()} calls, |
| 18 | 18 | * is that there is a certain built-in backward compatibility when a replica with a new version and additional |
| 19 | - * fields expected in the initial load tries to replica from an older version where those fields don't exist |
|
| 19 | + * fields expected in the initial load tries to replicate from an older version where those fields don't exist |
|
| 20 | 20 | * yet in this type. Then, those additional fields will come out as {@code null} on the replica, and the replica |
| 21 | 21 | * at least has a chance to continue with a useful initialization of those data structures instead of having |
| 22 | 22 | * the replication of {@link SecurityService} and all subsequent {@link Replicable}s fail due to incompatible |